Bug 618773

Summary: packages without errata released to rhel 5 server and client
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Elliot Peele <elliot>
Component: relengAssignee: Daniel Mach <dmach>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Release Test Team <release-test-team-automation>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 5.5CC: jeder, jgreguske, tao
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-10-26 11:53:57 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Elliot Peele 2010-07-27 17:16:18 UTC 
Description of problem:
Within the past six weeks the following packages were released to the RHEL 5 server and client base channels with no associated errata.

This was probably done in the process of releasing RHEA-2010:0492. Only the qspice-client package is associated with this errata and this errata is not part of the RHEL 5 server channel.

RHEL 5 Server
celt051-0.5.1.3-0.el5.i386.rpm
celt051-0.5.1.3-0.el5.x86_64.rpm
qcairo-1.8.7.1-3.el5.i386.rpm
qcairo-1.8.7.1-3.el5.x86_64.rpm
qffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.15.20080908.el5.i386.rpm
qffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.15.20080908.el5.x86_64.rpm
qpixman-0.13.3-4.el5.i386.rpm
qpixman-0.13.3-4.el5.x86_64.rpm
qspice-client-0.3.0-2.el5_5.i386.rpm
qspice-client-0.3.0-2.el5_5.x86_64.rpm
spice-xpi-2.2-1.el5_5.i386.rpm
spice-xpi-2.2-1.el5_5.x86_64.rpm

RHEL 5 Client
celt051-0-0.5.1.3-0.el5-i386
celt051-0-0.5.1.3-0.el5-x86_64
qcairo-0-1.8.7.1-3.el5-i386
qcairo-0-1.8.7.1-3.el5-x86_64
qffmpeg-libs-0-0.4.9-0.15.20080908.el5-i386
qffmpeg-libs-0-0.4.9-0.15.20080908.el5-x86_64
qpixman-0-0.13.3-4.el5-i386
qpixman-0-0.13.3-4.el5-x86_64
Comment 1 Elliot Peele 2010-07-28 23:03:48 UTC 
Was the addition of these packages without errata intentional?
Comment 2 Elliot Peele 2010-07-28 23:06:35 UTC 
Tracking issue in our system:

https://issues.rpath.com/browse/PFM-752
Comment 3 Daniel Mach 2010-07-29 05:45:17 UTC 
Jay, this is related to bz#581030 and it's intentional, correct?
Comment 4 Jay Greguske 2010-07-29 11:49:39 UTC 
Yes, correct.
Comment 6 Daniel Mach 2010-10-26 11:53:57 UTC 
The change was intentional, see comments #3 and #4.
Closing NOTABUG.