Bug 618934

Summary: The echo's man page in Japanese doesn't describe '\e' and '\xHH' for the option -e.
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Shinji Kito <skito>
Component: man-pages-jaAssignee: Akira TAGOH <tagoh>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: QE Internationalization Bugs <qe-i18n-bugs>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 6.0CC: eng-i18n-bugs, fnadge, jwest, ktakemur, moshiro, myamazak, skito, snagar, tao
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: man-pages-ja-20100115-3.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Cause: The old man page of echo(1) didn't contains descriptions of '\e' and '\xHH' syntax for -e option. Consequence: no descriptions of the above syntax in Japanese. Fix: Added the descriptions of '\e' and '\xHH' syntax for -e option. Result: The Japanese man page of echo(1) keeps up to date comparing with English version.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-02-02 15:25:38 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 659134    

Description Shinji Kito 2010-07-28 05:44:47 UTC
Description of problem:
The echo's man page in Japanese doesn't describe "\e" and "\xHH" for the option -e.
The echo's man-page in English says;

      If -e is in effect, the following sequences are recognized:

      \\     backslash

      \a     alert (BEL)

      \b     backspace

      \c     produce no further output

      \e     escape

      \f     form feed

      \n     new line

      \r     carriage return

      \t     horizontal tab

      \v     vertical tab

      \0NNN  byte with octal value NNN (1 to 3 digits)

      \xHH   byte with hexadecimal value HH (1 to 2 digits)

Since both "\e" and "\xHH" for "-e" are available on RHEL6, the man page
in Japanese should describe them according to the above description.
Could you please revise the man page in Japanese?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHEL 6 beta2 snapshot7
Related Package Version: man-pages-ja-20100115-2.el6.noarch

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Just run the Japanese man page of echo.

  
Actual results:
Japanese man page for echo is missing '\e' and '\xHH' for the option -e.

Expected results:
Japanese man page for echo should have '\e' and '\xHH' for the option -e.

Additional info:

Comment 3 Akira TAGOH 2011-01-14 10:09:41 UTC
Fixed in man-pages-ja-20100115-3.el6.

Comment 5 Florian Nadge 2011-01-19 17:22:20 UTC
Please be so kind and add a few key words to the technical note of this
bugzilla entry using the following structure:

Cause:

Consequence:

Fix:

Result:


For details, see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#cf_release_notes

Thanks

Comment 6 Florian Nadge 2011-01-19 17:22:21 UTC
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
Cause:

Consequence:

Fix:

Result:

Comment 7 Akira TAGOH 2011-01-21 12:22:22 UTC
    Technical note updated. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    Diffed Contents:
@@ -1,7 +1,11 @@
 Cause:
+The old man page of echo(1) didn't contains descriptions of '\e' and '\xHH' syntax for -e option.
 
 Consequence:
+no descriptions of the above syntax in Japanese.
 
 Fix:
+Added the descriptions of '\e' and '\xHH' syntax for -e option.
 
-Result:+Result:
+The Japanese man page of echo(1) keeps up to date comparing with English version.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2011-02-02 15:25:38 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0192.html