Bug 61936

Summary:	Shouldn't redhat-lsb be included by default?
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Public Beta	Reporter:	Chris Adams <linux>
Component:	distribution	Assignee:	Bill Nottingham <notting>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	skipjack-beta1	CC:	rvokal
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2002-03-26 20:01:42 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	61590

Description Chris Adams 2002-03-26 02:06:26 UTC

To insure LSB compatibility, shouldn't the redhat-lsb package be included in the
comps file for most (or all) default configs?  It isn't much good if nobody
installs it. :-)

Comment 1 Chris Adams 2002-03-26 15:19:01 UTC

You've changed the component to "bind" - is there a reason?  I don't see how
that relates to this.  This should either be under redhat-lsb or maybe anaconda.

Comment 2 Matt Wilson 2002-03-26 16:16:40 UTC

The bugzilla component for 'comps' went away.  This goes to 'distribution'

Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2002-04-09 18:26:19 UTC

At this point, I'd say we should leave it as separate for those who want LSB apps.