Bug 619509

Summary: [abrt] crash in evolution-2.30.2-1.fc13: talloc_chunk_from_ptr: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Sullivan G. Scott, Jr. <sscott>
Component: evolutionAssignee: Matthew Barnes <mbarnes>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 13CC: lucilanga, mbarnes, mcrha
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:700cef19a7d292398abed488199e235cb3359e45
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-09 16:18:25 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description Sullivan G. Scott, Jr. 2010-07-29 17:31:48 UTC 
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: evolution
comment: System had forcefully logged me out while the desktop was locked.  Logged back in.  Launched evolution.  Attempted to open an email on the exchange 2007 server.  Evolution attempted to refresh and then crashed.
component: evolution
crash_function: talloc_chunk_from_ptr
executable: /usr/bin/evolution
global_uuid: 700cef19a7d292398abed488199e235cb3359e45
kernel: 2.6.33.6-147.fc13.x86_64
package: evolution-2.30.2-1.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

How to reproduce
-----
1. Logged back into desktop (gnome)
2. Launched evolution
3. Attempted to look at an email on the echange server.  Evolution crashed.
Comment 1 Sullivan G. Scott, Jr. 2010-07-29 17:31:50 UTC 
Created attachment 435355 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 16:18:25 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 619516 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 16:18:25 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #619516.

Sorry for the inconvenience.