Bug 623093

Summary: [abrt] crash in java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.0-41.b18.fc13: raise: Process /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/jre/bin/java was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: robert fairb <rob2098>
Component: java-1.6.0-openjdkAssignee: Deepak Bhole <dbhole>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 13CC: dbhole, jpechane, langel, lkundrak, mjw
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:438dd14325876abdf319e93b8e29d8b2054ecc07
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-09 14:52:40 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description robert fairb 2010-08-11 10:05:46 UTC
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: java -Dazureus.install.path=/home/robertONLY/.azureus/app -Dazureus.script.version=2 -Dazureus.script=/usr/bin/azureus org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.Main
comment: i cant seem to report the previous one because its to long and the backtrace is unusable
component: java-1.6.0-openjdk
crash_function: raise
executable: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/jre/bin/java
global_uuid: 438dd14325876abdf319e93b8e29d8b2054ecc07
kernel: 2.6.33.6-147.2.4.fc13.i686
package: java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.0-41.b18.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/jre/bin/java was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

How to reproduce
-----
1.i opened firefox
2.
3.

Comment 1 robert fairb 2010-08-11 10:05:52 UTC
Created attachment 438147 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 14:52:40 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 641189 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 14:52:40 UTC
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #641189.

Sorry for the inconvenience.