Bug 623449

Summary: [abrt] crash in evolution-2.30.2-4.fc13: raise: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher>
Component: evolutionAssignee: Matthew Barnes <mbarnes>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 13CC: lucilanga, mbarnes, mcrha
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:63aae33944cd5c4ab6731898b30d8506c724e26c
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-09 15:02:53 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description Jeff Kirsher 2010-08-11 19:52:49 UTC 
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: evolution
comment: I added the "Flag for Follow Up" column to the inbox message window, and Evolution crashed.  Since then, I am not able to open Evolution at all.  It continues to crash upon opening, and does not give me enough time to do anything.
component: evolution
crash_function: raise
executable: /usr/bin/evolution
global_uuid: 63aae33944cd5c4ab6731898b30d8506c724e26c
kernel: 2.6.33.6-147.2.4.fc13.i686.PAE
package: evolution-2.30.2-4.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

How to reproduce
-----
1. Add the "Flag for Follow up" in the Inbox Display
2.
3.
Comment 1 Jeff Kirsher 2010-08-11 19:52:53 UTC 
Created attachment 438277 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 15:02:53 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 607187 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 15:02:53 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #607187.

Sorry for the inconvenience.