Bug 623547

Summary: [abrt] totem-mozplugin-2.90.5-5.fc14: raise: Process /usr/libexec/totem-plugin-viewer was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael>
Component: totemAssignee: Bastien Nocera <bnocera>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 14CC: bnocera
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:6accdd66bf71c600f3b26a293c7273d78a7055d0
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-09 14:38:44 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description Michael Schwendt 2010-08-12 06:07:57 UTC 
abrt version: 1.1.10
architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/totem-plugin-viewer --plugin-type gmp --user-agent Windows-Media-Player/10.00.00.4019 --referrer http://www.bp.com/sectionbodycopy.do?categoryId=9034366&contentId=7063636 --mimetype video/x-msvideo --no-controls
component: totem
crash_function: raise
executable: /usr/libexec/totem-plugin-viewer
kernel: 2.6.35-0.57.rc6.git1.fc14.x86_64
package: totem-mozplugin-2.90.5-5.fc14
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/totem-plugin-viewer was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 14 (Branched)
time: 1281592907
uid: 500

How to reproduce
-----
1. rpm -e totem
2. start firefox
3. load http://www.bp.com/sectionbodycopy.do?categoryId=9034366&contentId=7063636

totem-mozplugin fails to load a file from missing package "totem" and crashes.
Comment 1 Michael Schwendt 2010-08-12 06:08:00 UTC 
Created attachment 438347 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 14:38:44 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 603704 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 14:38:44 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #603704.

Sorry for the inconvenience.