Bug 623569

Summary: RFE: require static library
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: Kirby Zhou <kirbyzhou>
Component: lzoAssignee: Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala <huzaifas>
Status: CLOSED EOL QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: el5CC: cleaver-redhat, huzaifas, steve
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-04-06 10:27:27 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch for EPEL5 (lzo-2.02-2.el5.1) version of lzo.spec none

Description Kirby Zhou 2010-08-12 07:49:21 UTC
RFE: require static library

Could you please make a static library of lzo?

Comment 1 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2010-08-12 08:36:37 UTC
why?, fedora has a policy of using dynamic libs, where ever possible.

Comment 2 Kirby Zhou 2010-08-12 09:00:27 UTC
a lot of libXXX-devel contains a static version of its .so file.
I think lzo should do the same. It helps people who want to distribute binarys compiled with lzo.


[@djt_10_48 ~]# ll /usr/lib64/*.so | wc -l
224
[@djt_10_48 ~]# ll /usr/lib64/*.a | wc -l  
143

Comment 3 Mark Chappell 2010-09-23 20:12:31 UTC
Kirby, Huzaifa: 
*  In general, packagers are strongly encouraged not to ship static libs unless a compelling reason exists. 

As recently pointed out on the devel mailing list, fedora actively discourages shipping static libraries.  Choosing to do so is at the packagers discretion.

Comment 4 Japheth Cleaver 2015-02-04 19:03:04 UTC
"Shipping" or building? This feels like the type of thing that can be included in an Everything (Fedora) or Optional (EL/EPEL) repository for those who have a use for it, without it being brought in for normal builds, nor impact the default distribution.

As an example, "zlib-static" is built and available in the rhel-7-server-optional-rpms channel on EL7. (This really goes for all versions (rawhide/fedora/rhel/epel).)

The mere existence of an lzo-static package (even if it's not included by default) would help those who'd like to migrate from whatever current use of zlib-static they have in their environment.

Comment 5 Japheth Cleaver 2015-02-04 19:04:27 UTC
Created attachment 988248 [details]
Patch for EPEL5 (lzo-2.02-2.el5.1) version of lzo.spec

Comment 6 Fedora End Of Life 2017-04-06 10:27:27 UTC
Fedora EPEL 5 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2017-03-31. Fedora EPEL 5
is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora
or Fedora EPEL, please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If
you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current
release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.