Bug 623664
Summary: | tiffinfo pc260001.tif segfaults on s390x and ppc64 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Ales Zelinka <azelinka> | ||||
Component: | libtiff | Assignee: | Petr Hracek <phracek> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | BaseOS QE - Apps <qe-baseos-apps> | ||||
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | high | ||||||
Version: | 6.0 | CC: | mhradile, thozza | ||||
Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2015-10-21 08:32:59 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 947775, 1070830, 1159820, 1269889 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Ales Zelinka
2010-08-12 13:17:45 UTC
Um ... no attachment here ... Created attachment 439416 [details]
pc260001.tif
Wouldn't be me if I hadn't forgotten to attach the file.
I've filed this upstream at http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2258 I'm not clear on what a reasonable fix would be, and am inclined to consider it low-priority, since TIFFPrintDirectory is probably not used in any security-critical contexts. Observed again [1], [2]. Can we make some conclusion about our test [3] behaviour at the moment? [1] https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/matrix/?toggle_nacks_on=on&job_ids=26980 [2] https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/matrix/?toggle_nacks_on=on&job_ids=27396 [3] /CoreOS/libtiff/Regression/official-test-images This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an exception in the current release, please ask your support representative. This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an exception in the current release, please ask your support representative. This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an exception in the current release, please ask your support representative. This request was not resolved in time for the current release. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. This request was erroneously removed from consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4, which is currently under development. This request will be evaluated for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4. I can no longer reproduce this on libtiff-3.9.4-10.el6_5 (current version). Both s390x and ppc64 work ok. This bug can IMO be closed. Thanks. Closing it with CLOSED->CURRENTRELEASE. Feel free to reopen it in case of troubles. |