Bug 625128

Summary: [abrt] crash in firefox-3.6.7-1.fc13: Process /usr/lib64/firefox-3.6/firefox was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: bryanscionti
Component: firefoxAssignee: Gecko Maintainer <gecko-bugs-nobody>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 13CC: gecko-bugs-nobody
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:ff52e293af867959226698f070df01045cf94124
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-09 15:36:06 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description bryanscionti 2010-08-18 16:31:54 UTC
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/lib64/firefox-3.6/firefox
component: firefox
crash_function: nsProfileLock::FatalSignalHandler
executable: /usr/lib64/firefox-3.6/firefox
global_uuid: ff52e293af867959226698f070df01045cf94124
kernel: 2.6.33.6-147.2.4.fc13.x86_64
package: firefox-3.6.7-1.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/lib64/firefox-3.6/firefox was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

How to reproduce
-----
1. Was running firefox fine, then did hard shutdown by holding down power button.
2. After restarting computer, firefox crashes within 2 seconds of starting firefox every time.
3. Removed firefox and reinstalled it. Still the same problem.

Comment 1 bryanscionti 2010-08-18 16:31:56 UTC
Created an attachment (id=439440)
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 15:36:06 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 625048 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 15:36:06 UTC
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #625048.

Sorry for the inconvenience.