Bug 626765

Summary:	The latest F14 ocaml-lablgtk has lower NVR than F13
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Adam Tkac <atkac>
Component:	ocaml-lablgtk	Assignee:	Adam Tkac <atkac>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	14	CC:	amdunn, dwheeler, fedora-ocaml-list, gemi, ovasik, rjones
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.0-6.fc14	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-09-08 04:35:48 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Adam Tkac 2010-08-24 11:17:17 UTC

Description of problem:
The latest F14 ocaml-lablgtk has lower NVR than F13 because the latest F14 build failed (https://kojiweb.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=187388).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
$ koji latest-pkg dist-f13-updates ocaml-lablgtk
Build                                     Tag                   Built by
----------------------------------------  --------------------  ----------------
ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.0-5.fc13               dist-f13-updates      dwheeler

$ koji latest-pkg dist-f14-updates-candidate ocaml-lablgtk
Build                                     Tag                   Built by
----------------------------------------  --------------------  ----------------
ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.0-4.fc13               dist-f14              rjones
  
Actual results:
F13 package is newer than F14 one

Expected results:
F14 NVR >= F13 NVR

Additional info:
Main problem is that ocaml-lablgtk redefines glib's g_value_{get,set}_variant symbols. I'm not sure if simple removal of those symbols from ocaml-lablgtk sources doesn't cause regression.

Comment 1 Richard W.M. Jones 2010-08-24 11:31:29 UTC

(In reply to comment #0)
> Additional info:
> Main problem is that ocaml-lablgtk redefines glib's g_value_{get,set}_variant
> symbols. I'm not sure if simple removal of those symbols from ocaml-lablgtk
> sources doesn't cause regression.

This came up on the mailing list:
http://www.math.nagoya-u.ac.jp/~garrigue/soft/olabl/lablgtk-list/628.txt

Comment 2 Adam Tkac 2010-08-24 11:50:25 UTC

Thanks for info. Are you going to fix this issue and release update for F14, please, or should I do it myself?

Comment 3 Richard W.M. Jones 2010-08-24 12:23:36 UTC

Please go ahead.

It wasn't clear to me whether upstream had posted a fix or if they
were just saying the fix was 'easy'.  You might want to send an email
to Jacques if you can't find the right patch.

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2010-08-24 13:41:19 UTC

ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.0-6.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.0-6.fc14

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2010-08-25 01:23:40 UTC

ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.0-6.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ocaml-lablgtk'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.0-6.fc14

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2010-09-08 04:35:43 UTC

ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.0-6.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.