Bug 628031
Summary: | SELinux is preventing /usr/lib64/firefox-3.6/firefox from making the program stack executable. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Joel <xurzwi2q1> |
Component: | selinux-policy | Assignee: | Daniel Walsh <dwalsh> |
Status: | CLOSED CANTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 14 | CC: | c522523, dwalsh, fedora.jrg01, igeorgex, mgrepl, mjc, teva.riou |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | setroubleshoot_trace_hash:acf1820b0a59ac9f64de7fb992bf3dda340d4433ec3adc5bf6e55979fb75afb3 | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-08-30 14:38:01 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Joel
2010-08-27 17:22:57 UTC
This started happening after installing the Sun/Oracle Java plugin for Firefox. Also, the referenced website for how to "remove the requirement" points to a useless page (http://people.redhat.com/drepper/selinux-mem.html). I will fix the troubleshoot to point at http://www.akkadia.org/drepper/selinux-mem.html I do not know why oracles java plugin is forcing firefox to need execstack. I guess it is moving the java code internal versus executing java as a separate app, like the Fedora one does. I guess if you want to use their plugin you need to turn off the execstack check for unconfined users. # setsebool -P allow_execstack 1 Can you provide a narrower boolean, like "allow_browser_execstack"? Or, what would the best local policy module rules be? I would like to handle Sun Java without completely enabling execstack. - Mike Does # chcon -t execmem_exec_t /usr/lib64/firefox-3.6/firefox Fix the problem? Yes, it does. Thanks! - Mike |