Bug 629149

Summary: "BOGUS NODE" folder in directory base
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Brian LaMere <brianlamere>
Component: 389-consoleAssignee: Rich Megginson <rmeggins>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 13CC: jgalipea, nhosoi, nkinder, rmeggins
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: screened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-09-07 17:37:21 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Brian LaMere 2010-09-01 04:51:45 UTC
Description of problem:

Within the 389-ds-console main window, under my domain base, is a nameless folder.   If I select the folder, on the bottom left of the 389-console directory server window, where the DN should be listed, it instead says "BOGUS NODE".  If I double-click the folder, an error box appears that says:

====
Error reading object 'dn: BOGUS NODE'.
The error sent by the server was:
'No such object'.
====

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

389-adminutil-1.1.9-1.fc13.x86_64
389-console-1.1.3-5.fc13.noarch
389-admin-console-1.1.4-2.fc12.noarch
389-ds-console-1.2.0-5.fc12.noarch
389-ds-console-doc-1.2.0-5.fc12.noarch
389-admin-selinux-1.1.11-0.1.a1.fc13.x86_64
389-admin-1.1.11-0.1.a1.fc13.x86_64
389-admin-console-doc-1.1.4-2.fc12.noarch
389-ds-base-1.2.6-0.1.a1.fc13.x86_64
389-ds-base-selinux-1.2.6-0.1.a1.fc13.x86_64

How reproducible:

Noticed it after a schema update; unlikely to be related to the update itself, as the custom schema only has attributetypes and objectclasses, and no entries have been created.

However, to prepare for the dynamic reload of the schema, I did take the system out of replication (as instructed on the 389ds docs).  I noticed the problem prior to putting the systems back in replication, and the problem wasn't replicated to the other multi-master node.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Apparently the version I am using is an "alpha" that shouldn't have been put in the stable repo list; I'm concerned about whether I'll have upgrade issues when I go to install 1.2.6-1 which I'm told is going to be released later this week?