Bug 63255

Summary: named.conf man-page and groff disagree on format(s)
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Glen A. Foster <glen.foster>
Component: caching-nameserverAssignee: Florian La Roche <laroche>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.2   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: ia64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-04-25 04:50:13 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
stderr output from "man named.conf" none

Description Glen A. Foster 2002-04-11 18:43:03 UTC 
Description of Problem: On my IA64 box when I run "man named.conf", I see a slew
of errors (307 lines of output) written to stderr that (IMO) should not exist. 
I will attach the file after this defect is committed.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

# rpm -q groff caching-nameserver
groff-1.17.2-7.0.2
caching-nameserver-7.2-1

How Reproducible: 100%

# man named.conf > OUT 2> ERR
... yields the file (ERR) I am about to attach
Comment 1 Glen A. Foster 2002-04-11 18:44:02 UTC 
Created attachment 53466 [details]
stderr output from "man named.conf"
Comment 2 Glen A. Foster 2002-04-15 18:28:25 UTC 
*** Bug 63551 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Dax Kelson 2002-04-25 04:50:09 UTC 
*** Bug 64077 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Florian La Roche 2002-11-03 20:41:35 UTC 
Most of these are gone with the current versions.

greetings,

Florian La Roche
Comment 5 Glen A. Foster 2002-11-04 15:41:27 UTC 
There is a change made to the code (a new version, I presume from your message) 
and you closed the bug WONTFIX?  That seems strange to me.  How about re-
opening it and closing it RAWHIDE or CURRENTRELEASE?  That indicates that the 
bug was actually repaired... and you claim it is in the latest version.