Bug 636581
Summary: | Review Request: arduino-mk - A Makefile for compiling and uploading to Arduino micro-controllers | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Peter Oliver <mavit> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | esandeen, esm, fedora-package-review, notting, opensource, scott |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-05-20 14:43:56 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 631558 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 636598 |
Description
Peter Oliver
2010-09-22 15:55:11 UTC
Does it make sense to have this one file in a separate package, vs adding it to aduino-core? (I ask primarily because the upstream page mentions that debian has added it to arduino-core). -Eric Another improvement would be to decide in cooperation with upstream on a environment variable that points to the make file and is set in /etc/profile.d. Then Makefiles can easily include this makefile using it, e.g. with: include $(ARDUINO_MK) I think it makes sense to include this in arduino-core It appeared for a while that Arduino would include an official makefile in the future, which would make this redundant, but it now looks like that's not going to happen. There seem to be a number of different makefiles around, not necessarily kept compatible with the latest version of Arduino. I'm no-longer sure that it makes sense to include one with Fedora at all. |