Bug 636619

Summary:	-openssl patch is broken
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Enrico Scholz <rh-bugzilla>
Component:	bacula	Assignee:	Andreas Thienemann <andreas>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	andreas, dnovotny, fschwarz, gwync, jgorig, mmcgrath, rvokal, vanmeeuwen+fedora
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	bacula-5.0.3-2.fc15	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-09-23 12:38:12 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Enrico Scholz 2010-09-22 17:51:53 UTC

Description of problem:

The bacula-5.0.2-openssl.patch in d3f21207e11c84faddc044b7c8005f8a5f32ac57 contains

-#ifdef HAVE_OPENSSLv1
+#ifdef OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x10000000L

The new condition matches everytime and should be

+#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x10000000L

instead of (note the '#if' vs. '#ifdef').

Comment 1 Jan Görig 2010-09-23 12:38:12 UTC

Thank you for your bug report. I don't know how I can write this terrible code...

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2010-11-24 17:34:50 UTC

bacula-5.0.3-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bacula-5.0.3-1.fc14

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2010-11-24 17:48:20 UTC

bacula-5.0.3-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bacula-5.0.3-1.fc13

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2011-01-06 19:26:10 UTC

bacula-5.0.3-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2011-01-06 19:28:12 UTC

bacula-5.0.3-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.