Bug 637937
Summary: | register with autosubscribe fails to consume RHEL Personal Bits | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Community] Candlepin | Reporter: | John Sefler <jsefler> |
Component: | candlepin | Assignee: | Devan Goodwin <dgoodwin> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | John Sefler <jsefler> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 0.5 | CC: | bkearney, dgoodwin, whayutin |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Solaris | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-01-25 16:36:46 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 639436 |
Description
John Sefler
2010-09-27 19:36:09 UTC
The problem was, rhsm used to delete (not store) entitlement certificates, which don't have product data encoded. This usually happens with marketing type products. So, list --consumed behaves as above. Anyway, the above issue has been fixed in sha: 582f7d109b4544fcffaf92609b53ada591356792 I still do not see the --autosubscribe step binding to the sub-pools as described in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637937#c0 [root@jsefler-onprem01 ~]# rpm -q subscription-manager subscription-manager-0.93.2-1.git.26.e1db2f8.fc12.i386 Moving the state back to ASSIGNED Need info on what product certificates were installed on the system attempting to auto-subscribe. Please post results of: ls /etc/pki/product And if the number of certs isn't too huge, for each cert: openssl x509 -text -in /etc/pki/product/37060.pem | grep 2312 Also confused about Ajay's attempted fix, does the system (after auto-subscribe) actually get a certificate in /etc/pki/entitlement? This isn't mentioned in the ticket but it looks like he assumed there was, just wanted to verify if this was discussed outside the bz. Thanks! Closing as a duplicate of 672438. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 672438 *** |