Bug 638711
Summary: | [regression] 'lvremove' fails sometimes to remove snapshot volumes | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Brian Likosar <liko> |
Component: | lvm2 | Assignee: | Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Corey Marthaler <cmarthal> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 6.1 | CC: | agk, bmarzins, bmr, centaur, coughlan, cyberrider, davidz, dwysocha, frank, ftaylor, heinzm, jbrassow, joe.thornber, jonathan, kay.sievers, kparal, kueda, liko, llowrey, lvm-team, mbroz, msnitzer, ndevos, nls1729, prajnoha, prockai, rh-bugzilla, walter.haidinger |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | 577798 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2011-05-30 09:33:50 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 577798 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Brian Likosar
2010-09-29 18:07:41 UTC
Bug 577798 (the original report) has further information on this issue, starting here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577798#c11 We've applied a patch upstream that tries to minimize device RW open calls within the LVM itself. This should also prevent the events based on the watch rule from being fired when not necessary, at least with respect to internal LVM handling of devices: https://www.redhat.com/archives/lvm-devel/2011-May/msg00025.html (LVM2 v2.02.86) However, there's still a possibility that somone else, externally, will open a device for read-write and close it (which will cause the uevent to occur) just before the device is removed and so we could end up with the same problem as reported here - in this case, we have no control over this asynchronicity. (For a hassle about the watch rule and more related information see also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561424) |