Bug 639751

Summary: Java code @Annotations are highlighted incorrectly
Product: [Community] Publican Reporter: Jared MORGAN <jmorgan>
Component: publicanAssignee: Jeff Fearn <jfearn>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 1.6CC: jfearn, mmcallis, mmurray, oskutka, publican-list, r.landmann
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
See Also: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253218
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-10-04 02:36:15 EDT Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Description Flags
Mixture of parameterless and parameterized annotations
example of how kate highlights this text none

Description Jared MORGAN 2010-10-03 18:22:13 EDT
Description of problem:

I'm raising this bug on behalf of a JBoss Community QA team-member.  The original ticket can be read at: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBDOCS-327

The current code highlighting package doesn't handle java annotations well. Parameterized annotations are highlighted as methods and parameterless annotations are not highlighted at all. 

Moreover having method names highlighted is not standard.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Publican v2.1

How reproducible:

100%. Content is consistently formatted incorrectly.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a Java <programlisting> that contains annotations.
2. Publish using Publican.
3. Note the formatting.
Actual results:

Results appear as per the attached picture.

Expected results:

Parameterized, and Parameterless Annotations are highlighted correctly, and classnames are formatted appropriately. 

Additional info:
Comment 1 Ondrej Skutka 2010-10-04 01:59:14 EDT
Created attachment 451340 [details]
Mixture of parameterless and parameterized annotations
Comment 2 Jeff Fearn 2010-10-04 02:27:51 EDT
Created attachment 451344 [details]
example of how kate highlights this text
Comment 3 Jeff Fearn 2010-10-04 02:36:15 EDT
This text is highlighted exactly the same as how it's highlighted in Kate, which is exactly what syntax::highlighter::kate is supposed to do.

If this behaviour requires changing then a bug should be opened upstream, against Kate, to get the source changed.