Bug 640938

Summary: "Warning: more packages were installed by yum than expected" appeared during install
Product: Red Hat Satellite 5 Reporter: Jan Hutař <jhutar>
Component: InstallerAssignee: Jan Pazdziora (Red Hat) <jpazdziora>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Red Hat Satellite QA List <satqe-list>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 540CC: cperry, jpazdziora
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-12-10 23:35:35 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 462714    

Description Jan Hutař 2010-10-07 09:38:27 UTC
Description of problem:
During Galactica installation Jan P. discovered:

# /tmp/media.mnt-zb5609/install.pl --answer-file=answers.txt --non-interactive --disconnected --run-updater
[...]
* Applying updates.
* Installing RHN packages.
Warning: more packages were installed by yum than expected:
	crypto-utils
        gpg-pubkey   # <<< only in Jan P. case
        libxslt      # <<< only in Jan P. case
	perl-DBD-Pg
	yum-utils
* Now running spacewalk-setup.
[...]


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Satellite-5.4.0-RHEL5-re20101001.1-x86_64


How reproducible:
3 of 3


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run installer
2. Watch installation


Actual results:
* Installing RHN packages.
Warning: more packages were installed by yum than expected:
	crypto-utils
        gpg-pubkey
        libxslt
	perl-DBD-Pg
	yum-utils


Expected results:
* Installing RHN packages.
* Now running spacewalk-setup.


Additional info:
This might be caused by some Beaker setup (as Beaker automatically installs some non-@Base packages)

Comment 2 Jan Pazdziora (Red Hat) 2010-12-10 23:35:35 UTC
I believe this is dupe to bug 640585.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 640585 ***