Bug 641187
Summary: | Any value that is out of range of cpu_shares can be specified. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Humble Chirammal <hchiramm> |
Component: | libvirt | Assignee: | Osier Yang <jyang> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 6.1 | CC: | ajia, dallan, eblake, weizhan, xen-maint |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | libvirt-0.8.7-5.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-05-19 13:22:38 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Humble Chirammal
2010-10-08 00:38:20 UTC
patch posted internally. http://post-office.corp.redhat.com/archives/rhvirt-patches/2011-February/msg00019.html I can reproduce the bug on rhel6.0 with libvirt-0.8.1-27.el6.x86_64, and the bug has been verified with libvirt-0.8.7-5.el6.x86_64 on rhel6 (2.6.32-113.el6.x86_64), and developers have improved virsh man page for this section: Note: The cpu_shares parameter has a valid value range of 0-262144; Negative values are wrapped to positive, and larger values are capped at the maximum. Therefore, -1 is a useful shorthand for 262144. This is a documentation update, so that user could known for setting cpu.shares: The cpu_shares parameter has a valid value range of 0-262144; Negative values are wrapped to positive, and larger values are capped at the maximum. Therefore, -1 is a useful shorthand for 262144. We aleady documented this in virsh manual. (man virsh) An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0596.html |