Bug 641414

Summary:	Broken dependency: rubygem-rack-accept-doc-0.4.3-4.fc14.noarch requires rack-accept = 0:0.4.3-4.fc14
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	James Laska <jlaska>
Component:	rubygem-rack-accept	Assignee:	Michal Fojtik <mfojtik>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	14	CC:	awilliam, bugs.michael, jturner, mfojtik
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	repoclosure_hash:5cd3b71f405e39abc41231f502e0e36abc51c8e4890745db34ebf992bcf72c24
Fixed In Version:	rubygem-rack-accept-0.4.3-5.fc12	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-10-19 07:07:43 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	642449

Description James Laska 2010-10-08 16:00:53 UTC

Added repo-1 repo from http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/14/x86_64/os
Added repo-2 repo from http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/testing/14/x86_64
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 2
   repo-1
   repo-2
Num Packages in Repos: 22124
package: rubygem-rack-accept-doc-0.4.3-4.fc14.noarch from repo-2
  unresolved deps: 
     rack-accept = 0:0.4.3-4.fc14

Comment 1 Adam Williamson 2010-10-08 19:04:33 UTC

Dependency and conflict issues are automatically accepted as nice-to-have.

Comment 2 Michal Fojtik 2010-10-08 19:23:55 UTC

Hmm, strange, this package was not yet pushed to Fedora 14. It's still in 'testing' state inside Bodhi. However, I'm pushing it to stable.

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2010-10-08 19:24:44 UTC

rubygem-rack-accept-0.4.3-4.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-rack-accept-0.4.3-4.fc14

Comment 4 Adam Williamson 2010-10-13 00:27:13 UTC


-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

Comment 5 Michael Schwendt 2010-10-17 14:44:17 UTC

rubygem-rack-accept-0.4.3-4.fc14 is exactly the version this bug report is about. It does NOT fix this issue. If you don't understand what is wrong about the dependencies, consider asking.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2010-10-18 10:10:21 UTC

rubygem-rack-accept-0.4.3-5.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-rack-accept-0.4.3-5.fc13

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2010-10-18 10:17:05 UTC

rubygem-rack-accept-0.4.3-5.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-rack-accept-0.4.3-5.fc14

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2010-10-18 10:28:51 UTC

rubygem-rack-accept-0.4.3-5.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-rack-accept-0.4.3-5.fc12

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2010-10-18 20:53:26 UTC

rubygem-rack-accept-0.4.3-5.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-rack-accept'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-rack-accept-0.4.3-5.fc14

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2010-10-19 07:07:34 UTC

rubygem-rack-accept-0.4.3-5.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2010-10-19 09:06:19 UTC

rubygem-rack-accept-0.4.3-5.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2010-11-04 23:45:14 UTC

rubygem-rack-accept-0.4.3-5.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.