Bug 641962

Summary:	Review Request: rubygem-couch_potato - Ruby persistence layer for CouchDB
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jozef Zigmund <jzigmund>
Component:	0xFFFF	Assignee:	Ryan Rix <ry>
Status:	CLOSED DEFERRED	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	dwmw2, fedora-package-review, mtasaka, notting, ry, vondruch
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	NotReady
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-03-22 08:37:42 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jozef Zigmund 2010-10-11 15:57:22 UTC

Spec URL: http://st.fri.uniza.sk/~zigmundj/fedorapkg/rubygem-couch_potato.spec
SRPM URL: http://st.fri.uniza.sk/~zigmundj/fedorapkg/rubygem-couch_potato-0.3.1-1.fc13.src.rpm
Description: The goal of Couch Potato is to create a minimal framework in order to store and retrieve Ruby objects to/from CouchDB and create and query views

Comment 1 Ryan Rix 2010-10-13 00:37:10 UTC

I'll take this review.

Comment 2 Ryan Rix 2010-10-13 00:43:08 UTC

I'm going to set this back to NEW for the same reasons as bug 641957.

Comment 3 Mamoru TASAKA 2010-10-14 16:48:52 UTC

I don't see rubygem(couchrest) and rubygem(activemodel)
in Fedora or package review. Would you package them first?

Comment 4 Jozef Zigmund 2010-10-14 17:08:50 UTC

Yes, i would, but the same as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641957
(In reply to comment #3)
> I don't see rubygem(couchrest) and rubygem(activemodel)
> in Fedora or package review. Would you package them first?

Comment 5 Mamoru TASAKA 2010-10-14 17:29:43 UTC

(In reply to comment #4)
> Yes, i would, but the same as
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641957
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > I don't see rubygem(couchrest) and rubygem(activemodel)
> > in Fedora or package review. Would you package them first?

Please check my comment bug 641957 comment 5.

Comment 6 Jozef Zigmund 2010-11-10 15:21:51 UTC

(In reply to comment #3)
> I don't see rubygem(couchrest) and rubygem(activemodel)
> in Fedora or package review. Would you package them first?

Here are the review requests:
Couchrest - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651880
Activemodel - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651898

Comment 7 Vít Ondruch 2011-03-22 08:37:42 UTC

This is optional dependency for #641957, but not required ATM.