Bug 642871

Summary: [abrt] evolution-2.32.0-2.fc14: raise: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Dmytro Taranovsky <dmytro>
Component: evolutionAssignee: Matthew Barnes <mbarnes>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 14CC: lucilanga, mbarnes, mcrha
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:1871e54bc11f51479c1eb613ee6be0d507d1fab4
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-09 15:56:51 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description Dmytro Taranovsky 2010-10-14 00:51:26 UTC 
abrt version: 1.1.13
architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: evolution
component: evolution
crash_function: raise
executable: /usr/bin/evolution
kernel: 2.6.35.6-39.fc14.x86_64
package: evolution-2.32.0-2.fc14
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)
How to reproduce: When configuring evolution, I selected Exchange MAPI, entered the requested information, pressed authenticate, and after a few seconds, evolution crashed.
time: 1287014678
uid: 500

comment
-----
Notes:
* The exchange server version is 2003.
* Although the exchange username is dmytro_taranovsky, the email address is dmytro.taranovsky@....
* I am using the current version (with updates-testing enabled) of the upcoming Fedora 14.
* Exchange MAPI worked for me sometime in the past (but I did not use it because of other issues).  However, the crash always happens with the current version.
Comment 1 Dmytro Taranovsky 2010-10-14 00:51:28 UTC 
Created attachment 453349 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 15:56:51 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 631873 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 15:56:51 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #631873.

Sorry for the inconvenience.