Bug 64293

Summary: RFE: allow an override of the /etc/nologin testing.
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Aleksey Nogin <aleksey>
Component: opensshAssignee: Tomas Mraz <tmraz>
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: dkelson, evan
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-05-25 09:52:02 EDT Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On: 54108, 117981    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Aleksey Nogin 2002-05-01 16:29:22 EDT
Currently sshd tests for /etc/nologin *both* through the pam and on its own.
This is very annoying - one assumes that it's possible to override the tests by
modifying the /etc/pam.d/sshd, but then it turns out that the pam_nologin in
/etc/pam.d/sshd is redundant and that sshd does the testing itself and there is
no way to override it.

In short, this RFE is for:
1) Configuration option to override the /etc/nologin testing in sshd itself (see
also bug #47298).
2) Change in the default config shipped by RedHat to have the override turned on.

P.S. According to bug #54108, the pam_nologin needs to be moved from auth to
account in order to work properly even with the RSA authentication.
Comment 1 Dax Kelson 2004-09-17 21:41:09 EDT
I concur this should be fixed. This is not how Red Hat Linux 9 behaved
and having upgraded to Fedora Core 2 from RHL9 I was bitten by this.

Comment 2 Evan McNabb 2004-09-17 22:11:51 EDT
This also appears to be a problem in RHEL 3. In my opinion there
shouldn't be a toggle switch in sshd; the check should be done only in
Comment 3 Tomas Mraz 2005-02-07 05:44:49 EST
Without solving bug 54108 the nologin processing shouldn't be removed. Also
note, that the contents of /etc/nologin should be dumped on client's terminal.
This isn't/cannot be the case of using pam for nologin processing.

Adding a new configuration option is also not good without having it in upstream
portable OpenSSH first so please report it to http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/.
Comment 4 Tomas Mraz 2005-05-25 09:52:02 EDT
OK, done that for you even with a patch.

If upstream accepts it we'll see.