Bug 644006

Summary: [abrt] evolution-2.32.0-2.fc14: g_hash_table_lookup_node: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: miceliux
Component: evolutionAssignee: Matthew Barnes <mbarnes>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 14CC: cupp, datahal42, e.liger, lucilanga, mbarnes, mcrha, nalimilan, redhat, todd
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:4b0dac80fb6909b28ce9a18fa56bb06ed12dfd9b
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-08 19:39:45 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description miceliux 2010-10-18 18:34:59 UTC 
abrt version: 1.1.13
architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: evolution
component: evolution
crash_function: g_hash_table_lookup_node
executable: /usr/bin/evolution
kernel: 2.6.35.6-43.fc14.x86_64
package: evolution-2.32.0-2.fc14
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)
time: 1287419573
uid: 1000

How to reproduce
-----
1. I have evolution configured with my IMAP gmail account
2. Enter in the account properties
3. I did't change anything, only click Accept to close the properties and ...crash!
Comment 1 miceliux 2010-10-18 18:35:06 UTC 
Created attachment 454187 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Erwan Legrand 2010-11-08 16:10:26 UTC 
Package: evolution-2.32.0-2.fc14
Architecture: x86_64
OS Release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)


How to reproduce
-----
I do not know.


Comment
-----
I was configuring an IMAP / SMTP account when Evolution crashed.
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-08 19:39:45 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 638714 ***
Comment 4 Karel Klíč 2010-11-08 19:39:45 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #638714.

Sorry for the inconvenience.
Comment 5 Milan Crha 2010-11-25 10:12:33 UTC 
*** Bug 657032 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Milan Crha 2011-03-17 09:41:37 UTC 
*** Bug 688304 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Milan Crha 2011-03-30 07:05:52 UTC 
*** Bug 691998 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Milan Crha 2011-05-09 06:43:03 UTC 
*** Bug 702765 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Milan Crha 2011-05-23 06:37:40 UTC 
*** Bug 706401 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***