Bug 64469
Summary: | Install of Skipjack Beta 2 with Grub over 7.2/Lilo results in unbootable system | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Public Beta | Reporter: | Tom Warfel <tew> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Brock Organ <borgan> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | skipjack-beta2 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2002-05-09 18:59:05 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Tom Warfel
2002-05-05 23:26:22 UTC
This isn't really a lilo bug at all. It's argueably not a bug at all (and usually that's what we say). The deal is, on a fresh install instead of an upgrade, we don't know that there is lilo gunk on the MBR. However, as often as this particular problem has come up, I'm tempted to suggest that this be changed from a bug report to a RFE (Request For Enhancement) in anaconda and make it so that anaconda can detect exactly what is on the MBR of the boot drive during an install and warn you if the boot loader setup you have selected will result in an unbootable system. I'm changing the component to anaconda so that the proper people can reply to that suggestion. Thank you; that would be great. Intuitively (to me, anyway), a "clean install" should result in a bootable system, regardless of how the components had been previously used. If the machine cannot make the system bootable, either some kind of warning saying "you better install on MBR instead of /sda1 because there's junk there now that won't let it boot", or better yet, just create a clean MBR (there are those of us who don't have a copy of MS-DOS floating around - and DR.DOS 7.03's fdisk didn't work). That's why we clearly state in the help and on the screen that you need to install to the same place. Blowing away people's MBR without telling them is completely unacceptable because it makes it difficult/impossible to do multiple installs on the same machine or use alternate bootloaders not shipped in Red Hat Linux. |