Bug 645321
| Summary: | Review Request: python-orange - Orange data mining library for python | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Howard Ning <mrlhwliberty> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED CANTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, jdy, mrunge, notting, stjepan.gros |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-03-24 19:32:51 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 658489 | ||
|
Description
Howard Ning
2010-10-21 10:18:26 UTC
2.0-0.2: Add the desktop file. http://helloworld1.fedorapeople.org/python-orange.spec http://helloworld1.fedorapeople.org/python-orange-2.0-0.2.fc14.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2549955 2.0-0.3: fix the license issues: http://helloworld1.fedorapeople.org/python-orange.spec http://helloworld1.fedorapeople.org/python-orange-2.0-0.3.fc14.src.rpm You are using a snapshot release. Isn't the date missing in the release tag and the changelog entries? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages I'm unsure about the name of this package. It's an application that is written in Python and they call most parts just orange. Yes it is missing but it is not the major issue. The name is OK because it is called this in their debian package. Orange is another software. The real problem of this package is bundled library. I really appreciate if anyone can look into this problem. *** Bug 666529 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** I also created package for orange not knowing that it was already done. Anyway, I don't insist on packaging orange so the Ning can use anything he finds usefull from my try. And I checked my package with rpmlint and there are no warning or error apart from rpath that I already described as potentially harmless in the bugzilla entry 666529. python-orange has bundled library libsvm. It would be a major problem. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries Any progress here? There is no progress on my side. I don't know how to strip the libsvm out of the source code without major hac. Ok, then I'd recommend to close this request and to open another when it's ready. You should ask upstream to fix this issue. This "page" indicates that orange has been modified to allow using external libraries for libsvm etc. http://orange.biolab.si/trac/browser/orange/setup-site.cfg Should just require applying a patch to setup-site.cfg to build against system libraries. Joel |