Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||[QLogic 6.1 feat] Update firmware to 5.03.13 for qla25xx devices.|
|Product:||Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6||Reporter:||Chad Dupuis (Cavium) <cdupuis>|
|Component:||ql2500-firmware||Assignee:||Rob Evers <revers>|
|Status:||CLOSED ERRATA||QA Contact:||Storage QE <storage-qe>|
|Version:||6.1||CC:||andrew.vasquez, bdonahue, cdupuis, coughlan, cward, rpacheco, tcallawa, zliu|
|Target Milestone:||beta||Keywords:||FutureFeature, OtherQA, Rebase|
|Fixed In Version:||ql2500-firmware-5.03.13-1.el6||Doc Type:||Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2011-05-19 09:11:21 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Chad Dupuis (Cavium) 2010-10-26 11:25:11 EDT
Update the inbox firmware in RHEL 6.1 for QLogic 8Gb/s HBAs to 5.03.13.
Comment 2 Ronald Pacheco 2010-10-26 13:52:34 EDT
This is strictly a firmware update.
Comment 3 Rob Evers 2010-10-26 14:07:42 EDT
(In reply to comment #2) > This is strictly a firmware update. will devel ack when an image is available and tested.
Comment 4 Chad Dupuis (Cavium) 2010-11-23 16:17:51 EST
Link to 5.03.13 firmware: ftp://ftp.qlogic.com/outgoing/linux/firmware/ql2500_fw.bin.
Comment 5 Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-11-23 16:55:46 EST
Chad, any chance of getting any sort of "Release Notes" here, so we can describe the Fedora update with any more detail than "moved to 5.03.13"?
Comment 6 Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-12-06 11:25:31 EST
Rob, the Fedora packages are done and the updates are pending (it will take a week for them to hit Fedora 13 and 14, because they're functionally impossible to test). https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ql2500-firmware-5.03.13-1.fc13,ql2400-firmware-5.03.13-1.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ql2500-firmware-5.03.13-1.fc14,ql2400-firmware-5.03.13-1.fc14
Comment 15 Chris Ward 2011-04-06 07:07:40 EDT
~~ Partners and Customers ~~ This bug was included in RHEL 6.1 Beta. Please confirm the status of this request as soon as possible. If you're having problems accessing 6.1 bits, are delayed in your test execution or find in testing that the request was not addressed adequately, please let us know. Thanks!
Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 09:11:21 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0592.html