Bug 649781

Summary: Review Request: cortado - Java media framework
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Hans de Goede <hdegoede>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review, lemenkov, notting
Target Milestone: ---Flags: lemenkov: fedora-review+
j: fedora-cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: cortado-0.6.0-2.fc14 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-20 13:21:36 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Hans de Goede 2010-11-04 14:50:29 UTC
Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jwrdegoede/cortado.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jwrdegoede/cortado-0.6.0-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description:
Cortado is a Java media framework based on GStreamer's design.

rpmlint output:
[hans@shalem devel]$ rpmlint *.src.rpm noarch/*
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Comment 1 Peter Lemenkov 2010-11-17 09:32:52 UTC
Koji scratchbuild for F-14 (w.i.p. at the moment of writing):

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2605882

Comment 2 Peter Lemenkov 2010-11-17 10:03:22 UTC
REVIEW:

Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable

+ rpmlint is silent

work ~/Desktop: rpmlint cortado-*
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
work ~/Desktop: 

+ The package is named according to the  Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec.

- The package almost meets the Packaging Guidelines except the following:

* The javadoc sub-package should require jpackage-utils instead of %{name} because it could be used w/o main package.

+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (GLPv2+ and LGPLv2+ for jheora).
+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL.

sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum cortado-0.6.0.tar.gz*
37a708bfceba5b7b0b544456bb3857f708c83734dfb3f3f1ababcc602b923e85  cortado-0.6.0.tar.gz
37a708bfceba5b7b0b544456bb3857f708c83734dfb3f3f1ababcc602b923e85  cortado-0.6.0.tar.gz.1
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: 

+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. See link above.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
0 No need to handle locales.
0 No shared library files.
+ The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
+ The package is not designed to be relocatable.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application.
0 No header files.
0 No static libraries.
0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files.
0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1).
0 No devel sub-package.
+ The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
0 Not a GUI application.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.



Ok, adjust explicit requirement in javadoc subpackage accordingly to draft version of Java Packaging Guidelines and I'll finish this review.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Akurtakov/JavaPackagingDraftUpdate#Javadoc_installation

Comment 3 Hans de Goede 2010-11-17 11:11:03 UTC
Thanks for the review!

Here is a new version with the javadoc Requires fixed:
Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jwrdegoede/cortado.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jwrdegoede/cortado-0.6.0-2.fc14.src.rpm

Comment 4 Peter Lemenkov 2010-11-17 12:49:15 UTC
Ok, good. I can't see other issues, so this package is

APPROVED.


btw, I would like you to review this package in exchange:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639263

Comment 5 Hans de Goede 2010-11-17 14:33:36 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: cortado
Short Description: Java media framework
Owners: jwrdegoede
Branches: f14
InitialCC:

Comment 6 Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-17 16:01:06 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 7 Hans de Goede 2010-11-19 16:09:33 UTC
Hi,

Once more thanks for the review.

(In reply to comment #4)
> btw, I would like you to review this package in exchange:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639263

I would be happy to review this in retur.,I've been unable to find the time for this the past 2 days, so it won't get around to it earlier then this Sunday.

Regards,

Hans

Comment 8 Hans de Goede 2010-11-20 13:21:36 UTC
Imported and build for rawhide, closing.

I'll do an F-14 build too as soon as jorbis gets tagged into the F-14 buildroot, see: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4265

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2010-11-22 21:11:22 UTC
cortado-0.6.0-2.fc14,jorbis-0.0.17-4.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cortado-0.6.0-2.fc14,jorbis-0.0.17-4.fc14

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2010-12-01 21:57:01 UTC
cortado-0.6.0-2.fc14, jorbis-0.0.17-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.