Bug 652573 (ghc-zip-archive)
Summary: | Review Request: ghc-zip-archive - Haskell zip-archive library | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jens Petersen <petersen> | ||||
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, haskell-devel, john.haxby, lakshminaras2002, notting | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | lakshminaras2002:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-4.fc14 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2011-01-13 23:36:09 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | 652571 | ||||||
Bug Blocks: | 652582 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Jens Petersen
2010-11-12 09:10:02 UTC
When I try to build this I get: Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JBZkcU + umask 022 + cd /home/jch/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd zip-archive-0.1.1.6 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + /usr/bin/runghc Setup configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib64 --docdir=/usr/share/doc/ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6 --htmldir=/usr/share/doc/ghc/html/libraries/zip-archive-0.1.1.6 '--libsubdir=$compiler/$pkgid' --enable-shared --ghc -p Configuring zip-archive-0.1.1.6... Setup: At least the following dependencies are missing: binary -any error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JBZkcU (%build) I suspect that this is something to do with the "binary" in zip-archive.cabal but really I have no idea what. Thanks for catching that - yes I had forgotten the ghc-binary-devel dependency. Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-zip-archive/ghc-zip-archive.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-zip-archive/ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-2.fc14.src.rpm * Thu Dec 2 2010 Jens Petersen <petersen> - 0.1.1.6-2 - also depends on binary (#652573) Created attachment 464957 [details]
patch to fix up rpmlint warning, added COPYING to the base rpm
I built and installed the package (incl devel and prof). I am unable to find the exported module ( Codec.Archive.Zip ) via ghci. Could you let me know whether it is the same case for you? Or I am doing something incorrect? I almost completed the review except for the above blocker. Thanks, Update: When I run ghci as root, I can see the exported module but not as a normal user. (In reply to comment #3) > patch to fix up rpmlint warning buildroot setting and cleaning is now deprecated in the Packaging Guidelines. > added COPYING to the base rpm Thanks - fixing: Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-zip-archive/ghc-zip-archive.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-zip-archive/ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-3.fc13.src.rpm (In reply to comment #4) > I am unable to find the exported module ( Codec.Archive.Zip ) via ghci. I was trying to test earlier but had some system (rpm or fs issue) problem. Can you describe the steps you are taking? So, sorry I can't test right now with rawhide but at least the following works for me: $ rpm -q ghc ghc-6.12.1-5.fc13.i686 $ cabal install zip-zrchive : : $ ghci -package zip-archive GHCi, version 6.12.1: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help Loading package ghc-prim ... linking ... done. : Loading package zip-archive-0.1.1.6 ... linking ... done. Loading package ffi-1.0 ... linking ... done. Prelude> :module Codec.Archive.Zip Prelude Codec.Archive.Zip> I can certainly look into to it more later, and we should certainly support ghci, but I am not sure if it is a review blocker. (In reply to comment #5) > When I run ghci as root, I can see the exported module but not as a normal > user. As a normal user what is your output of "ghc-pkg list zip-archive"? >buildroot setting and cleaning is now deprecated in the Packaging Guidelines.
True. I thought if I was patching it, I would add those two lines as well to reduce the rpmlint warnings :).
ghc-pkg list zip-archive
/usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/package.conf.d
zip-archive-0.1.1.6
--A small program like
import Codec.Archive.Zip
main = do
putStrLn "hello world"
return ()
--gives me this as a normal user
ghc --make test.hs
test.hs:1:7:
Could not find module `Codec.Archive.Zip':
Use -v to see a list of the files searched for.
But compiles as root.
I can approve the package. Once the build occurs in rawhide, I can help you out in testing the functionality using that small program.
I am getting a build error in rawhide. RPM build errors: File listed twice: /usr/share/doc/ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6 create archive failed on file /home/narasimhan/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-3.fc14.x86_64/usr/share/doc/ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6/LICENSE: cpio: Bad magic http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2656250 (In reply to comment #7) > ghc --make test.hs > > test.hs:1:7: > Could not find module `Codec.Archive.Zip': > Use -v to see a list of the files searched for. Works for me with rawhide ghc certainly. I suspect some local problem on your machine perhaps. But I can test F14 too later. (In reply to comment #8) > cpio: Bad magic Oops, me too. Fixed in: Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-zip-archive/ghc-zip-archive.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-zip-archive/ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-4.fc14.src.rpm > Works for me with rawhide ghc certainly.
> I suspect some local problem on your machine perhaps.
> But I can test F14 too later.
I created another non administrative user and tried to compile the file. It worked properly. I am guessing there is some issue with the set of packages I have installed via cabal using my regular account.
Here is my review. I did a ghc-pkg recache --user and that fixed the issue. The test program compiles and runs fine. [+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. ghc-zip-archive.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-zip-archive.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-zip-archive-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-zip-archive-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-zip-archive-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-zip-archive-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-zip-archive-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/zip-archive-0.1.1.6/libHSzip-archive-0.1.1.6_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. [+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Naming-Yes, only building the library not the executable Version-release - Matches License - OK, included COPYING into the base package. No prebuilt external bits - OK Spec legibity - OK Package template - OK Arch support - OK Libexecdir - OK rpmlint - yes changelogs - OK Source url tag - OK, validated. BuildRoot is ignored - OK %clean is ignored - OK Build Requires list - OK Summary and description - OK API documentation - OK, in devel package [+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Included LICENSE and COPYING file [+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. md5sum ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-4.fc14.src/zip-archive-0.1.1.6.tar.gz 4806077be79ecb5486306432ee93e38d ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-4.fc14.src/zip-archive-0.1.1.6.tar.gz md5sum ~/Downloads/zip-archive-0.1.1.6.tar.gz 4806077be79ecb5486306432ee93e38d ~/Downloads/zip-archive-0.1.1.6.tar.gz [+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Built on x86_64 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2688795 [+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [NA]MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly using the %find_lang macro [NA]MUST: Packages stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. Checked with rpmquery --list [NA]MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review. [+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. Checked with rpmquery --whatprovides [+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Checked with ls -lR [+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [+]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. [+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+]MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA]MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [NA]MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release} rpm -e ghc-zip-archive error: Failed dependencies: ghc-zip-archive = 0.1.1.6-4.fc14 is needed by (installed) ghc-zip-archive-devel-0.1.1.6-4.fc14.x86_64 rpm -e ghc-zip-archive-devel error: Failed dependencies: ghc-zip-archive-devel = 0.1.1.6-4.fc14 is needed by (installed) ghc-zip-archive-prof-0.1.1.6-4.fc14.x86_64 [NA]MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [NA]MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section [+]MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. checked with rpmquery --list [+]MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Should items [+]SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [+]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. Installed the package. wrote and ran a program that imports the module Control.Archive.Zip. Works as expected. [+]SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. cabal2spec-diff is OK. APPROVED. Thank you for the review. :) New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-zip-archive Short Description: Haskell zip-archive library Owners: petersen Branches: f14 f13 InitialCC: haskell-sig Git done (by process-git-requests). Packages built for f15, f14 and f13. ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-4.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-4.fc13 ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-4.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-4.fc14 ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghc-zip-archive'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-4.fc13 ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ghc-zip-archive New Branches: el6 Owners: petersen InitialCC: haskell-sig Git done (by process-git-requests). |