Bug 652665

Summary:	Review Request: erlang-luwak - Large-object storage interface for Riak
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fedora-package-review, james.hogarth, lemenkov, plemenko
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	NotReady
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-12-04 12:04:18 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	591926, 639263, 652546, 652585, 652598, 652629, 652648
Bug Blocks:

Description Peter Lemenkov 2010-11-12 13:48:40 UTC

Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-luwak.spec
SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-luwak-0-0.1.20101112gitb24f821.fc12.src.rpm
Description: Large-object storage interface for Riak.

This is another one of Riak's dependencies.

Comment 1 Peter Lemenkov 2011-01-24 11:29:19 UTC

Ver. 1.0.0

http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-luwak-1.0.0-1.fc12.src.rpm
http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-luwak.spec

Comment 2 Peter Lemenkov 2012-07-29 16:10:24 UTC

Raising NotReady - cannot be built in Koji right now and (which concerns me much more) it fails to pass 3 unit-tests on my Fedora-PPC. I'm investigating this.

Comment 3 James Hogarth 2015-12-04 02:01:02 UTC

All the dependencies are marked as closed but there have been no comments on this review request in years.

Peter are you intending to do anything with this?

As per policy if there is no response in a week this bug will be closed.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews

Comment 4 Peter Lemenkov 2015-12-04 12:04:18 UTC

(In reply to James Hogarth from comment #3)
> All the dependencies are marked as closed but there have been no comments on
> this review request in years.
> 
> Peter are you intending to do anything with this?

Nope. This is an abandoned project (upstream no longer develops/uses this). So I suppose we should close this as well.