Bug 653559
Summary: | [RFE] installed-rpms should contain an easily sortable installation date and the distro | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Pierre Carrier <prc> |
Component: | sos | Assignee: | Pierre Carrier <prc> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | jsaucier, prc |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-11-15 22:56:44 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Pierre Carrier
2010-11-15 17:17:15 UTC
Apart from a few exceptions, the VENDOR tag seems more consistent and more often defined in third-party repos than DISTRIBUTION. One notable exception would be dpkg packages converted through alien, where DISTRIBUTION is kept and vendor dropped (tested with Debian packaged). As usual, no strong opinion. Going with VENDOR for now, up for discussion. After discussing with pamadio, the intended change would not break http://checksysreport.com/ Achieved with https://fedorahosted.org/sos/changeset/1003 |