Bug 656469

Summary:	Perf: Add a timestamp index on the 1d table
Product:	[Other] RHQ Project	Reporter:	Heiko W. Rupp <hrupp>
Component:	Performance	Assignee:	RHQ Project Maintainer <rhq-maint>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Corey Welton <cwelton>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	4.0.0	CC:	lkrejci
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	656471 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-05-24 01:09:45 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	625146, 656471

Description Heiko W. Rupp 2010-11-23 19:56:57 UTC

SELECT MAX(time_stamp) FROM RHQ_MEASUREMENT_DATA_NUM_1D

is very expensive with a huge number of data -- basically Oracle does a full index scan as the
existing index is (schedule_id, time_stamp).

Putting an index on time_stamp only would remove the FIS burden and speed up this operation.
This also follows the similar index on the 1h and 6h tables.

Comment 1 Heiko W. Rupp 2010-11-24 08:24:30 UTC

Note, this can only be a shot term solution.

For a real fix, we need to "precompute" the data and store them in some separate table row.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621597

Comment 2 Lukas Krejci 2010-12-16 11:24:53 UTC

commit 2ba9e1c4cfcb7046bfce34996d4955b0091c08a6
Author: Lukas Krejci <lkrejci@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Dec 16 12:23:48 2010 +0100

    BZ 656469 - adding a temporary performance measure on the RHQ_MEASUREMENT_DATA_NUM_1D. Having an index on TIME_STAMP column helps the performance of the hourly jobs but a more involv
    
    This fix is part of RHQ 3.0.1 as well and therefore was added as schema spec 2.92.4 even though master is currently on schema spec 2.101.
    This is to support seamless upgrade of the releases, but of course intermittently this is schema spec is not going to get applied until a full dbsetup is executed.

Comment 3 Lukas Krejci 2010-12-20 10:07:21 UTC

commit 4f29065c937833a03f96d5d09f2f36d9fd5781f9
Author: Lukas Krejci <lkrejci@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Dec 20 10:58:40 2010 +0100

    BZ 656471 - adding missing index definition in db setup.

Comment 4 Lukas Krejci 2010-12-20 10:14:24 UTC

The previous commit hash is incorrect.

The correct one is:
6d4c02a946fe0117ba033b385a747b0a9d1e133b

Comment 5 Corey Welton 2011-01-04 03:34:14 UTC

QA closing - dev task, not much to readily QE here.

Comment 6 Corey Welton 2011-05-24 01:09:45 UTC

Bookkeeping - closing bug - fixed in recent release.