Bug 659031

Summary: [abrt] xfce4-notifyd-0.2.0-1.fc15: xfce_notify_daemon_finalize: Process /usr/lib/xfce4/notifyd/xfce4-notifyd was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Felix Braun <Felix.Braun>
Component: xfce4-notifydAssignee: Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: christoph.wickert
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:b3484445786b337f1391397e853b02047f90e053
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-12-09 01:08:15 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace
none
Backtrace with (most) debug symbols none

Description Felix Braun 2010-12-01 19:53:40 UTC 
abrt version: 1.1.14
architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/lib/xfce4/notifyd/xfce4-notifyd
component: xfce4-notifyd
executable: /usr/lib/xfce4/notifyd/xfce4-notifyd
kernel: 2.6.36.1-10.fc15.i686
package: xfce4-notifyd-0.2.0-1.fc15
reason: Process /usr/lib/xfce4/notifyd/xfce4-notifyd was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 15 (Rawhide)
time: 1291233103
uid: 500

How to reproduce
-----
1. anytime xf4notifyd displays a message
Comment 1 Felix Braun 2010-12-01 19:53:42 UTC 
Created attachment 464093 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Christoph Wickert 2010-12-01 20:50:18 UTC 
Works fine with on F14, must be some kind of incompatibly with libnotify 0.7.

Your backtrace lacks debug please run

# debuginfo-install xfce4-notifyd

and then try again.
Comment 3 Felix Braun 2010-12-02 20:53:08 UTC 
Created attachment 464369 [details]
Backtrace with (most) debug symbols
Comment 4 Christoph Wickert 2010-12-09 01:08:15 UTC 
We now have better backtraces in bug 660549 or 661141.
Comment 5 Christoph Wickert 2010-12-09 01:08:39 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 660549 ***