Bug 659123
Summary: | GFS2: gfs2_grow fails on a full file system | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Ben Marzinski <bmarzins> | ||||
Component: | cluster | Assignee: | Ben Marzinski <bmarzins> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Cluster QE <mspqa-list> | ||||
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | high | ||||||
Version: | 6.1 | CC: | adas, casmith, ccaulfie, ccoffey, cluster-maint, fdinitto, iannis, lhh, rpeterso, rwheeler, sbradley, swhiteho, tao, teigland | ||||
Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | 490649 | ||||||
: | 707091 (view as bug list) | Environment: | |||||
Last Closed: | 2011-05-19 12:54:31 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | 626561, 659137 | ||||||
Bug Blocks: | 707091 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Comment 2
Ben Marzinski
2010-12-03 18:45:39 UTC
Ran mkfs, filled the file system, ran growfs and filled the file system several times more and was able to grow the file system every time. Marking verified against gfs2-utils-3.0.12-40.el6. An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0537.html Created attachment 499850 [details]
Patch to allow gfs2_grow to use fallocate to grow full filesystems.
FYI the patch has been dropped from git RHEL6 branch because it was committed in GIT prior 6.1 branching and it´s not in 6.1 distcvs. |