Bug 659164

Summary: [abrt] evolution-data-server-2.32.1-1.fc14: magazine_chain_pop_head: Process /usr/libexec/e-addressbook-factory was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: António Lima <amrlima>
Component: evolution-data-serverAssignee: Matthew Barnes <mbarnes>
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 14CC: mbarnes, mcrha, mikhail.v.gavrilov
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:b71f5fe3419d4303757fa9efce4861199cb9236a
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-12-02 12:35:26 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description António Lima 2010-12-02 02:02:41 UTC
abrt version: 1.1.14
architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/e-addressbook-factory
component: evolution-data-server
crash_function: magazine_chain_pop_head
executable: /usr/libexec/e-addressbook-factory
kernel: 2.6.35.6-48.fc14.i686
package: evolution-data-server-2.32.1-1.fc14
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/e-addressbook-factory was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)
time: 1291254838
uid: 500

How to reproduce
-----
1. Clicked an mailto link and evolution crashed
2.
3.

Comment 1 António Lima 2010-12-02 02:02:44 UTC
Created attachment 464149 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Milan Crha 2010-12-02 08:44:41 UTC
Thanks for a bug report. Is this reproducible, please? I do not see it myself. If it is reproducible, then please close evolution, make sure e-addressbook-factory process is also not running, and then run it on a console like this:
  $ G_SLICE=always-malloc valgrind --num-callers=50 /usr/libexec/e-addressbook-factory &>eaf.log

and then run evolution on another console, and try to reproduce the crash. If it doesn't crash then close evolution and wait for 10 seconds till the factory is closed automatically, or just close it with Ctrl+C in it's terminal, if it'll take more than 10 seconds (it'll also take some time until valgrind is done with all the memory checking on close, so you might see whether it does anything with the processor usage.

When it's done, please upload the eaf.log, maybe it'll show something. Thanks in advance.

Comment 3 António Lima 2010-12-02 11:52:13 UTC
Hi,

I can't seem to reproduce the bug. Yesterday it crashed twice straight but maybe I should have tested further before reporting.

I think you may close the bug, if it happens again and I can reproduce it I'll reopen the bug and attach the information you requested.

Thanks and sorry for the trouble.

Comment 4 Milan Crha 2010-12-02 12:35:26 UTC
Thanks for the update. I'm closing this then, but it's pity you cannot reproduce it right now. And do not worry, there is no trouble with this at all :)

Comment 5 Mikhail 2012-05-12 04:10:19 UTC
This problem also occurs with me, but i couldn't report via abrt because this report exists



--- Running report_Bugzilla ---
Logging into Bugzilla at https://bugzilla.redhat.com
Bug is already reported: 659164
Logging out
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659164