Bug 661342
| Summary: | broken dependencies in EPEL6beta | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Tomas Lestach <tlestach> |
| Component: | cobbler | Assignee: | Scott J Henson <shenson> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | el6 | CC: | admin, awood, dgoodwin, erinn.looneytriggs, jimi, jmatlock, shenson, vanmeeuwen+fedora |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-04-17 01:46:39 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Tomas Lestach
2010-12-08 15:57:45 UTC
fence-agents are in several child channels of RHEL6. As far as I can tell, if this is a violation of policy is still up for discussion. As for the practical nature of things, would you still expect cobbler power management to continue to work without fence-agents or are you expecting an error message? Currently on EL4 and EL5, we don't require fence-agents and just recommend that you install it if you try to use the power management functions of cobbler. I'm going to extend that to EL6. Should be so for 2.0.11. Expect it to hit epel-testing around 20110110. (In reply to comment #1) > fence-agents are in several child channels of RHEL6. As far as I can tell, if > this is a violation of policy is still up for discussion. > > As for the practical nature of things, would you still expect cobbler power > management to continue to work without fence-agents or are you expecting an > error message? I can not find fence-agents in any rhel6 channel. I can not install cobbler and installation of spacewalk also failed. Is there any workaround? Any movement on this, checking koji shows no build for 2.0.11 and there was recently a security hole that was patched for cobbler, let me see here: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-1551 not sure if this is applicable to RHEL/EPEL versions of cobbler though. -Erinn (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > fence-agents are in several child channels of RHEL6. As far as I can tell, if > > this is a violation of policy is still up for discussion. > > > > As for the practical nature of things, would you still expect cobbler power > > management to continue to work without fence-agents or are you expecting an > > error message? > > I can not find fence-agents in any rhel6 channel. I can not install cobbler and > installation of spacewalk also failed. Is there any workaround? The HA channels have this repository. So the work around is to add them. I'll do a release as soon as I have a chance to get the fix out. (In reply to comment #4) > Any movement on this, checking koji shows no build for 2.0.11 and there was > recently a security hole that was patched for cobbler, let me see here: > http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-1551 not sure if this is > applicable to RHEL/EPEL versions of cobbler though. > > -Erinn I'm not sure how large of a security hole that is. I will look at getting that included for 2.0.11 (currently unreleased). I'll have to make sure that it doesn't negatively affect anything. I don't believe it does. Testing Bugzilla XML-RPC This should have been fixed and closed a while back. If not, please re-open via the github issue tracker: https://github.com/cobbler/cobbler/issues |