Bug 663657

Summary: dnsmasq(8) man page corrections
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: John Bradshaw <john>
Component: dnsmasqAssignee: Douglas Schilling Landgraf <dougsland>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: aquini, dougsland, dwmw2, itamar, jima, karsten, mhlavink, ovasik, veillard
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: EasyFix, ManPageChange, Patch
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-04-20 12:51:00 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
dnsmasq(8) patch none

Description John Bradshaw 2010-12-16 14:27:49 UTC 
Description of problem:
Spelling errors in dnsmasq(8) man page

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
dnsmasq-2.45-1.1.el5_3

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
man 8 dnsmasq
/usr/share/man/man8/dnsmasq.8.gz
  
Actual results:
Wrong spelling

Expected results:
Correct spelling

Additional info:
diff dnsmasq.8 dnsmasq_fixed
49c49
< that the requestor should not itself cache the information. This is
---
> that the requester should not itself cache the information. This is
264c264
< the server which answers first will be returned to the original requestor.
---
> the server which answers first will be returned to the original requester.
450c450
< allowable to ommit the hardware address and include the hostname, in
---
> allowable to omit the hardware address and include the hostname, in
Comment 1 John Bradshaw 2010-12-22 17:14:04 UTC 
Created attachment 470266 [details]
dnsmasq(8) patch
Comment 2 Ondrej Vasik 2011-03-09 20:31:55 UTC 
Moving this bug to Fedora as agreed with the reporter. I apologize if the manpage typo/grammar error was already fixed in version included in the Fedora, if that's the case, feel free to close the bug.
Comment 3 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2011-08-22 18:31:03 UTC 
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 4 Douglas Schilling Landgraf 2011-08-26 21:33:27 UTC 
Hello John,

     Thanks for the patch, I am going to apply it. 
However, have you ever tried to submit the patch to upstream? 

http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss

I am updating the dnsmasq to a newer version (2.58) in Fedora and noticed that they still have this typo in upstream. 

Cheers
Douglas
Comment 5 Douglas Schilling Landgraf 2011-08-28 18:22:29 UTC 
Hi,

Sent the patch to upstream for review before include to the package:
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2011q3/005208.html

Cheers
Douglas
Comment 6 Michal Hlavinka 2011-08-29 07:06:47 UTC 
Changing component back to dnsmasq (it's known bugzilla bug)
Comment 7 John Bradshaw 2011-08-29 22:40:42 UTC 
Hi Douglas,
Wasn't aware of the upstream, thanks for submitting it there.
J.
Comment 8 Douglas Schilling Landgraf 2012-04-20 12:51:00 UTC 
Hi John, 

    As the dnsmasq author shared, your patch is available in the version 2.59. Fedora currently ships 2.59 version, so I am closing this bz for now.

Feel free to re-open it in case of any problem.

Thanks!