Bug 666229
| Summary: | Review Request: swing-worker - Long running Swing GUI interacting tasks | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ismael Olea <ismael> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | akurtako, fedora-package-review, notting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2010-12-30 15:08:53 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Ismael Olea
2010-12-29 18:16:43 UTC
What's the point in having this package? Why not using openjdk version shich all ready has SwingWorker? FWIW, simply removing swing worker jar and everywhere it's mentioned in the build files should work. Same for activation.jar. I'm not a java coder, but reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SwingWorker now I understand your point. Thanks! I close this request. |