Bug 666529
Summary: | Review Request: python-orange - Python AI component based package | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Stjepan Gros <stjepan.gros> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | a.badger, fedora-package-review, notting, tomspur |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-01-11 17:26:13 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Stjepan Gros
2010-12-31 12:30:13 UTC
If you try to install this package rpm/yum will complain that liborange.so is required but no package provides it. This is an error since the mentioned library is in the package itself?! I don't know yet to fix it or what causes it so use force option to rpm to install the package. (In reply to comment #1) > If you try to install this package rpm/yum will complain that liborange.so is > required but no package provides it. This is an error since the mentioned > library is in the package itself?! I don't know yet to fix it or what causes it > so use force option to rpm to install the package. Does the package work as expected once installed? Maybe everything is fine, when you fixed rpmlint: * private-shared-object-provides see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering#Arch-specific_extensions_to_scripting_languages * binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath * wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding (When you fix the first warning, it should be installable again.) Ok, I fixed that and other rpmlint warnings except rpath one. Since so binary is in a non standard path (inside python site specific dir), as I understand packaging guidelines, rpath can stay as is? Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/python-orange/python-orange.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/python-orange/python-orange-2.0b-0.20101215.2.fc14.src.rpm And yes, library works for me (TM), since I have one program that uses orange and when I tried it it worked. This review request is a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645321 Maybe you guys could work together to create and review the package? Ok, I'll close this review request and transfer this to another bugzilla entry. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 645321 *** |