Bug 667580

Summary: [abrt] mail-notification-5.4-25.fc14: g_return_if_fail_warning: Process /usr/bin/mail-notification was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: David <dakpenguin>
Component: mail-notificationAssignee: Dmitry Butskoy <dmitry>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 14CC: dmitry, erik-fedora
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:e9a4e54682c7d33b46128bc14d414cecacd78d30
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-01-06 13:29:26 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace
none
File: reproduce none

Description David 2011-01-06 04:46:07 UTC 
abrt version: 1.1.14
architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: mail-notification -p
comment: I did not have evolution installed when I got this error, as it is not a depencency.  Installing evolution solved the problem, perhaps making it a dependency would fix this.
component: mail-notification
crash_function: g_return_if_fail_warning
executable: /usr/bin/mail-notification
kernel: 2.6.35.10-74.fc14.i686
package: mail-notification-5.4-25.fc14
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/mail-notification was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)
Attached file: reproduce
time: 1294286409
uid: 500
Comment 1 David 2011-01-06 04:46:11 UTC 
Created attachment 471983 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 David 2011-01-06 04:46:13 UTC 
Created attachment 471984 [details]
File: reproduce
Comment 3 Dmitry Butskoy 2011-01-06 13:29:26 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 654826 ***
Comment 4 David 2011-01-06 16:26:00 UTC 
It is not a total duplicate since that bug is on x86_64 and this is i686, but I would be surprised if the solutions are different.