| Summary: | RFE: Make baseline alert condition definitions less confusing | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Other] RHQ Project | Reporter: | Larry O'Leary <loleary> |
| Component: | Alerts | Assignee: | Nobody <nobody> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 3.0.0 | CC: | jshaughn, mazz |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Improvement |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: |
JON 2.4.0 on RHEL5
|
|
| Last Closed: | Type: | --- | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Larry O'Leary
2011-01-18 19:38:01 UTC
I retested using 10% instead of 0% (to ensure that it was not the 0% causing the issue) and the problem still exists. This does not appear to be an issue with the actual value of the percentage. This has to do with the UI being confusing. I was experiencing the same behavior and did some investigation. It turns out that this is the normal behavior if you don't have a baseline set for the metric in question. In that case the alert condition is not even evaluated, it's basically invalid until a baseline exists. There are a couple of things that make this confusing: 1) We allow a user to specify the condition to begin with. It's fair that we do because it could be a template, or just intentional. But perhaps we could do something more here. 2) It's easy to miss that this condition relates to baseline values. Min/Average/Max really means BaselineMin/BaselineAverage/BaselineMax. It's confusing because the Tables subtab shows Min/Average/Max and a user may think those are the values being tested against. They aren't, those are just calculated values for the Date Range being applied to the table. 3) It's not very easy to actually see if a Baseline is set (or when it may get set if it isn't already). And as a doc-note, baseline generation is currently only covered in the FAQ. One more technical note, it's not clear to me that if this type of condition exists, and the baseline is generated, that the agent condition cache gets refreshed in any timely manner to ensure that the new baseline value is picked up. We need to understand what happens in this scenario. I'm changing the title of this to be an RFE for RHQ4's GUI. FutureFeature Improvement |