Bug 671473

Summary: [abrt] nautilus-2.32.2.1-1.fc14: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: tomas <rouckat>
Component: nautilusAssignee: Tomáš Bžatek <tbzatek>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 14CC: ccecchi, fonya, tbzatek, tsmetana
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:1256c0e400c264dc8ebf8cca8c7ce7e6c51c1757
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-03-20 14:25:45 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description tomas 2011-01-21 15:54:25 UTC 
abrt version: 1.1.14
architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: nautilus
component: nautilus
crash_function: nautilus_window_get_active_slot
executable: /usr/bin/nautilus
kernel: 2.6.35.10-74.fc14.x86_64
package: nautilus-2.32.2.1-1.fc14
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)
time: 1295624389
uid: 500

How to reproduce
-----
1.I unmouted a hard disk in the external box connected via USB
2.
3.
Comment 1 tomas 2011-01-21 15:54:30 UTC 
Created attachment 474635 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Szabo Akos 2011-01-26 18:25:26 UTC 
Package: nautilus-2.32.2.1-1.fc14
Architecture: x86_64
OS Release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)


How to reproduce
-----
1. mount remote fs on local net with ssh
2. copy over some file
3. umount, crash


Comment
-----
I'm using a non standard port
Comment 3 abrt-bot 2012-03-20 14:25:45 UTC 
Backtrace analysis found this bug to be similar to bug #675910, closing as duplicate.

Bugs which were found to be similar to this bug: bug #598692, bug #603519, bug #608521, bug #613292, bug #620114, bug #657870, bug #660301, bug #662319, bug #664295, bug #675910, bug #702819

This comment is automatically generated.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 675910 ***