Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Description of problem:
Upstream commit e6b68d7 introduced a regression where the libvirtd daemon could try to free active event handles (fds being polled or timeouts); if the event subsequently occurs, this can result in arbitrary behavior including crashes.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libvirt-0.8.7-3.el6
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. start 60 VMs: for i in `seq 60`; do virsh start vm$i; done
2. stop 60 VMs: for i in `seq 60`; do virsh destroy vm$i; done
3. list all known VMs: virsh list --all
Actual results:
libvirtd crashed immediately after stopping the 60th VM
Expected results:
libvirt should never crash
Additional info:
This may be the root cause of bug 670848, although the stack trace from the above test does not match that bug report, so this is opened as a separate BZ until we are sure that there aren't any other problems.
Initial upstream patch to fix this and one other bug:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-January/msg00921.html
Verified with Passed in below environment:
# uname -a
Linux intel-5405-32-4.englab.nay.redhat.com 2.6.32-107.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jan 27 23:11:23 EST 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
libvirt-0.8.7-4.el6.x86_64
kernel-2.6.32-107.el6.x86_64
qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.132.el6.x86_64
Steps
1. start 60 VMs:
# for i in `seq 60`; do virsh start a$i; done
Domain a1 started
Domain a2 started
Domain a3 started
...
2. stop 60 VMs:
# for i in `seq 60`; do virsh destroy a$i; done
Domain a1 destroyed
Domain a2 destroyed
Domain a3 destroyed
....
3. list all VMs: # virsh list --all
# virsh list --all
Id Name State
----------------------------------
- a1 shut off
- a10 shut off
- a11 shut off
- a12 shut off
- a13 shut off
- a14 shut off
- a15 shut off
- a16 shut off
- a17 shut off
- a18 shut off
- a19 shut off
- a2 shut off
- a20 shut off
.....
--------------
I have reproduced this bug with libvirt-0.8.7-3.el6. It also applys for 60 guests.
# for i in `seq 40`; do virsh start a$i; done
# for i in `seq 40`; do virsh destroy a$i; done
...
Domain a38 destroyed
Domain a39 destroyed
error: cannot recv data: : Connection reset by peer
error: failed to connect to the hypervisor
# virsh list --all
error: unable to connect to '/var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock', libvirtd may need to be started: Connection refused
error: failed to connect to the hypervisor
# service libvirtd status
libvirtd dead but pid file exists
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0596.html