Bug 672211
Summary: | Rebase virt-what in RHEL 6.2 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Richard W.M. Jones <rjones> |
Component: | virt-what | Assignee: | Richard W.M. Jones <rjones> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 6.2 | CC: | jzheng, leiwang, pcao, qwan |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Rebase |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | virt-what-1.11-1.1.el6 | Doc Type: | Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-12-06 09:57:47 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 671510, 707524 |
Description
Richard W.M. Jones
2011-01-24 12:20:20 UTC
No pm-ack, so no rebase ... https://brewweb.devel.redhat.com/taskinfo?taskID=3427278 I have pushed this early so that QA can begin on this package as soon as possible. NOTE regressions in this package could also affect subscription-manager! The rebased virt-what is the same as upstream virt-what 1.11 + the single patch that was added to git after 1.11 was released. In other words, it's the same as upstream git d87e9cbae. Upstream git repo: http://git.annexia.org/?p=virt-what.git;a=summary Upstream tarballs: http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-what/files/ virt-what-1.11-1.1.el6.i686/x86_64 on RHEL 6 host. # virt-what kvm virt-what-1.11-1.1.el6.i686/x86_64 on RHEL 5 host. # virt-what kvm virt-what-1.11-1.1.el6.i686/x86_64 on Xen host. PV: # virt-what xen HVM: # virt-what xen xen-hvm virt-what-1.11-1.1.el6.i686/x86_64 on ESX 3.5 host. # virt-what vmware virt-what-1.11-1.1.el6.i686/x86_64 on ESX 4.0 host. # virt-what vmware virt-what-1.11-1.1.el6.i686 on PowerVM x86 world. # virt-what powervm_lx86 virt-what-1.11-1.1.el6.s390x on SystemZ (s390x-6s-v1.ss.eng.bos.redhat.com). # virt-what ibm_systemz ibm_systemz-zvm Hyper-V host environment is being setting up. It should be done within 1 or 2 days. (In reply to comment #9) > virt-what-1.11-1.1.el6.i686/x86_64 on Xen host. > > PV: > # virt-what > xen This one is wrong. Assuming this is a RHEL 6 guest (domU) running on a Xen hypervisor, the output should be: # virt-what xen xen-domU Can you double-check this one? If it's still failing, can you give me some more details of the Xen host: Is it RHEL 5? Is it Citrix Xen? Can I get a login to this guest? I re-checked it. Still no 'xen-domU', either 32 or 64 guest. It's RHEL6, not RHEL5 or Citrix. Thanks for checking this again. I had a look at this guest, and of course being RHEL 6.1 it's using pv_ops. This is in fact a known bug / shortcoming in virt-what (see [1]). We don't know how to tell the difference between dom0 and domU with pv_ops kernels -- it's probably doable but we don't know how. So don't worry about this test. As long as it prints 'xen' we're OK. [1] http://git.annexia.org/?p=virt-what.git;a=blob;f=virt-what.in;h=4f381ab4c38cd9d38861a0fbfe764d2c5d5c59b4;hb=HEAD#l190 virt-what-1.11-1.1.el6.i686/x86_64 on Hyper-V. # virt-what hyperv Now all the hypervisors and guests are tested, moving this to VERIFIED. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1556.html |