Bug 672781

Summary: [abrt] evolution-2.32.1-1.fc14: g_type_check_instance_cast: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Cyril Sluchanko <bugzilla.10.cyrils>
Component: evolutionAssignee: Matthew Barnes <mbarnes>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 14CC: lucilanga, mbarnes, mcrha
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:af448216d00d55465c80a35b34da2de8a72aab59
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-01-26 16:35:01 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description Cyril Sluchanko 2011-01-26 11:08:41 UTC 
abrt version: 1.1.14
architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: evolution
component: evolution
crash_function: g_type_check_instance_cast
executable: /usr/bin/evolution
kernel: 2.6.35.10-74.fc14.x86_64
package: evolution-2.32.1-1.fc14
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)
time: 1296038548
uid: 16777216

How to reproduce
-----
1. Attempt to send email message via Exchange MAPI.
2.
3.
Comment 1 Cyril Sluchanko 2011-01-26 11:08:47 UTC 
Created attachment 475366 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Cyril Sluchanko 2011-01-26 11:10:21 UTC 
Package: evolution-2.32.1-1.fc14
Architecture: x86_64
OS Release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)


How to reproduce
-----
1. Attempt to send email message via Exchange MAPI
2.
3.
Comment 3 Milan Crha 2011-01-26 16:35:01 UTC 
Thanks for a bug report. This particular one had been reported already, thus I'm marking it as a duplicate. The fix will be included in evolution-2.32.2.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 651025 ***