Bug 67294

Summary:	adapt control-center and redhat-artwork to new metacity
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide	Reporter:	Havoc Pennington <hp>
Component:	control-center	Assignee:	Owen Taylor <otaylor>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	1.0	CC:	hp, jrb
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2002-07-29 21:08:47 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	67217

Description Havoc Pennington 2002-06-21 22:59:57 UTC

control-center needs a new upstream version, and we need to add:
 - metacity theme configuration
 - icon theme configuration
 - metacity font configuration

Comment 1 Havoc Pennington 2002-07-15 02:20:21 UTC

Maybe GTK 1.2 theme, but I don't have a clue how to express that sanely in a GUI
("GTK 1.2 theme" is not a reasonable string to have in a UI).
Suggest instead just automatically changing the 1.2 theme if one is found with
the same name as the 2.0 theme.

Comment 2 Havoc Pennington 2002-07-15 02:21:07 UTC

*** Bug 68829 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Havoc Pennington 2002-07-15 02:21:29 UTC

*** Bug 68828 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Havoc Pennington 2002-07-15 20:22:02 UTC

*** Bug 67980 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Havoc Pennington 2002-07-29 16:25:32 UTC

Marking the head of the priority queue with priority high

Comment 6 Havoc Pennington 2002-07-29 21:08:42 UTC

Remaining issue here (that isn't punted - icon theme punted) 
is to build a new metacity with the themes moved, then adapt the control panel
to it. I'll build the new metacity soon.

Comment 7 Owen Taylor 2002-08-08 18:00:35 UTC

I think this is all fixed now. (Is that right, Jonathan?)

Comment 8 Jonathan Blandford 2002-08-08 18:59:08 UTC

I'm pretty sure it is.

Comment 9 Michael Fulbright 2002-12-20 17:38:25 UTC

Time tracking values updated