| Summary: | VNC server crashes at startup if more than 256 interfaces are defined on the system | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | RHEL Program Management <pm-rhel> |
| Component: | vnc | Assignee: | Adam Tkac <atkac> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Martin Cermak <mcermak> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | urgent | ||
| Version: | 5.6 | CC: | atkac, azelinka, cww, mcermak, ofourdan, ovasik, pm-eus, tim.cleveland+rhbug |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Patch, ZStream |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: |
On a system with more than 256 network interfaces, Xvnc terminated unexpectedly during startup. This error has been fixed, and Xvnc no longer crashes on systems with a large number of network interfaces.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-02-11 23:59:24 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Bug Depends On: | 659273 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
RHEL Program Management
2011-01-31 09:10:22 UTC
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
New Contents:
On a system with more than 256 network interfaces, Xvnc terminated unexpectedly during startup. This error has been fixed, and Xvnc no longer crashes on systems with a large number of network interfaces.
Comment #9 => VERIFIED An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0216.html |