Bug 67401
Summary: | nsswitch.conf need not contain nisplus by default | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Joshua Jensen <joshua> |
Component: | glibc | Assignee: | Jakub Jelinek <jakub> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Brian Brock <bbrock> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 9 | CC: | fweimer, nalin |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 2.3.2-27.9 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2003-04-17 18:49:35 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Joshua Jensen
2002-06-24 14:53:26 UTC
authconfig will add NIS to nsswitch.conf, but because it can not configure nisplus, it leaves nisplus in nsswitch.conf if it finds it there. I understand that authconfig will leave nisplus there if its *already* there... this is as it should be. My argument is against it being there by default. If someone adds it, sure: leave it there. But... if nisplus can't be configured in any other way than manually, why not have the administrator configure the machine for nisplus and add "nisplus" to nsswitch.conf themselves. Since we can't setup nisplus through authconfig, why do the first 5% of the job ourselves, when %99.99 percent of RHL machines will pay a small penality because of it? If we are already telling NIS+ admins that they have to set it up themselves... we wouldn't really inconvenience them by not adding a step that we shouldn't be doing for the vast majority of machines anyway. My 2, Joshua Shouldn't authconfig at least allow checking whether or not to use NIS+ and tell what needs to be done to configure NIS+? The new beta still has the same issue... why list it if has to be setup manually anyway? At least the current release doesn't use use nisplus anymore. Therefore I close this bug. |